Ocular surface and meibomian gland evaluation in euthyroid Graves' ophthalmopathy.

PURPOSE: Euthyroid Graves' ophthalmology (EGO) refers to the subgroup of thyroid eye disease patients with distinct clinical presentations. This study evaluated the ocular surface and meibomian gland changes in EGO patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at The Chinese University of Hong Kong including 34 EGO patients and 34 age-and sex- matched healthy controls. Outcome measures include anterior segment examination, keratographic and meibographic imaging. RESULTS: Between 34 EGO patients and 34 age and sex-matched healthy controls, EGO was associated with a higher ocular surface disease index (P < 0.01), higher severity of meibomian gland dropout (upper: P < 0.001, lower: P < 0.00001) and higher percentage of partial blinking (P = 0.0036). The worse affected eyes of the EGO patients were associated with corneal staining (P = 0.0019), eyelid telangiectasia (P = 0.0009), eyelid thickening (P = 0.0013), eyelid irregularity (P = 0.0054), meibomian gland plugging (P < 0.00001), expressibility (P < 0.00001), and meibum quality (P < 0.00001). When the two eyes of the same EGO patient were compared, the degree of meibomian gland dropout was higher among the worse affected eyes (upper: P < 0.00001, and lower: P < 0.00001). Tear meniscus height, lipid layer thickness, and noninvasive break-up time were comparable between the two eyes of EGO patients and also between EGO patients and healthy controls. TMH was positively correlated with the degree of exophthalmos (r = 0.383, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: EGO patients have more ocular surface complications and meibomian gland dropouts than healthy controls. Almost 60% of them had dry eye symptoms, but aqueous deficiency was not apparent. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanism of dry eye in EGO. (249 words).

Retinal image quality in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology alone or combined with 0.01% atropine.

BACKGROUND: The retinal image quality derived from lower-order (LOA) and higher-order aberrations (HOA) for fixed 3-mm and photopic pupil diameters, in children undergoing combined 0.01% atropine and orthokeratology (AOK) versus those receiving orthokeratology alone (OK) over two years was evaluated. METHODS: The visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (VSOTF), derived from 2nd- to 4th-order terms (LOA and HOA combined), 2nd-order terms (LOA only), and 3rd- to 4th-order terms (HOA only) for fixed 3-mm and natural photopic pupil diameters, was compared between the two treatment groups. The individual Zernike coefficients for a fixed 3-mm pupil size of 2nd- to 4th-orders, root mean square (RMS) of LOA ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] combined), HOA (3rd to 4th orders inclusive), and Coma ([Formula: see text] combined) were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Right eye data of 33 AOK and 35 OK participants were analysed. Under photopic conditions, significantly lower VSOTF based on HOA only was observed in the AOK group compared with that in the OK group at all post-treatment visits (all P < 0.05); however, interactions between HOA and LOA resulted in comparable overall retinal image quality (i.e., VSOTF based on LOA and HOA combined) between the two groups at all visits (all P > 0.05). For a fixed 3-mm pupil size, the VSOTF based on HOA only, LOA only, or HOA and LOA combined, were not different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). AOK participants had slower axial elongation (mean ± SD, 0.17 ± 0.19 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.20 mm, P < 0.001), a larger photopic pupil size (4.05 ± 0.61 mm vs. 3.43 ± 0.41 mm, P < 0.001) than OK participants, over two years. CONCLUSIONS: HOA profile related to an enlarged pupil size may provide visual signal influencing eye growth in the AOK group.

Enhanced Monofocal Versus Conventional Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare different outcomes of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) versus a conventional monofocal IOL implantation after cataract surgery. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline was used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Comparative studies between enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal IOL implantations reporting outcomes in monocular and binocular visual acuities at various distances, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity, optical quality, and adverse effects were identified from three databases. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 680 eyes implanted with an enhanced monofocal IOL (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00; Johnson & Johnson) and 647 eyes with a conventional monofocal IOL from 3 randomized controlled trials and 9 comparative studies were included. The enhanced monofocal IOL showed better monocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) (mean difference [MD]: -0.11 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.09), binocular UIVA (MD: -0.17 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.11), and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity performance (MD: -0.17 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.04) than the conventional monofocal IOL. More patients were spectacle free at intermediate distance with the enhanced monofocal IOL (odds ratio: 12.9; 95% CI: 6.2 to 27.0). Both monocular (MD: -0.002 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01) and binocular (MD: 0.01 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.03) uncorrected distance visual acuity revealed non-significant differences between the IOL designs. Contrast sensitivity, photic phenomenon, and adverse effects were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced monofocal IOLs effectively improved unaided intermediate vision with similar distance performance relative to conventional monofocal IOLs. This was achieved without compromising the contrast sensitivity or inducing photic phenomena. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):538-546.].

Measuring Human Corneal Stromal Biomechanical Properties Using Tensile Testing Combined With Optical Coherence Tomography.

Purpose: To investigate the ex vivo elastic modulus of human corneal stroma using tensile testing with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and its correlation with in vivo measurements using corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology. Methods: Twenty-four corneal specimens extracted from stromal lenticules through small incision lenticule extraction were cut into strips for uniaxial tensile tests. In vivo corneal biomechanical responses were evaluated preoperatively using the corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (CorVis ST). The correlation of the elastic modulus with clinical characteristics and dynamic corneal response parameters were analyzed using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results: The mean low strain tangent modulus (LSTM) of the human corneal stroma was 0.204 ± 0.189 (range 0.010-0.641) MPa, and high strain tangent modulus (HSTM) 5.114 ± 1.958 (range 2.755-9.976) MPa. Both LSTM (r = 0.447, p = 0.029) and HSTM (r = 0.557, p = 0.005) were positively correlated with the stress-strain index (SSI). LSTM was also positively correlated with the A1 deflection length (r = 0.427, p = 0.037) and A1 deflection area (r = 0.441, p = 0.031). HSTM was positively correlated with spherical equivalent (r = 0.425, p = 0.038). Conclusions: The correlation of corneal elastic modulus with A1 deflection parameters and SSI may indicate a relationship between these parameters and tissue elasticity. The HSTM decreased with the degree of myopia. Combining tensile test with OCT may be a promising approach to assess corneal biomechanical properties.

Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking using iontophoresis versus the Dresden protocol in progressive keratoconus: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Standard epithelium-off collagen cross-linking using Dresden protocol (S-CXL) is the standard of care for progressive keratoconus. Despite its efficacy, epithelial debridement is associated with pain, delayed visual rehabilitation, stromal oedema and haze. Minimising these complications while achieving a comparable efficacy remains an unmet need. METHODS: Comparative studies between transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted CXL (I-CXL) and S-CXL reporting the outcomes of visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometry, demarcation line, endothelial cell density, confocal microscopy or complications were identified from databases. Assessments of publication bias, meta-analyses, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regressions were performed. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, 586 eyes from three randomised controlled trials and seven comparative studies were analysed. No differences were found in the change in uncorrected/corrected distance visual acuities, mean/maximum keratometry, central corneal thickness, higher order aberration, spherical aberration, coma, subbasal nerve/anterior stromal keratocyte density and demarcation line depth in both CXL protocols (P ≥ .052). However, I-CXL resulted in less thinning at the minimum pachymetry (standardised mean difference 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.44). More importantly, there was a significant reduction in complications following I-CXL (odds ratio 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.75). Meta-regression analyses on demarcation line depth and complication suggested that I-CXL was more effective than S-CXL when baseline maximum keratometry was >55.2 D and the risk of complication was independent of other baseline covariates. CONCLUSION: I-CXL has a more favourable safety profile, as evidenced by the available literature, with less thinning at the minimum pachymetry and reduced risk of complications while achieving comparable effects on visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometry, and morphological outcomes as S-CXL.

Associations Between Regional Environment and Cornea-Related Morphology of the Eye in Young Adults: A Large-Scale Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: To investigate environmental factors associated with corneal morphologic changes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, which enrolled adults of the Han ethnicity aged 18 to 44 years from 20 cities. The cornea-related morphology was measured using an ocular anterior segment analysis system. The geographic indexes of each city and meteorological indexes of daily city-level data from the past 40 years (1980-2019) were obtained. Correlation analyses at the city level and multilevel model analyses at the eye level were performed. Results: In total, 114,067 eyes were used for analysis. In the correlation analyses at the city level, the corneal thickness was positively correlated with the mean values of precipitation (highest r [correlation coefficient]: >0.700), temperature, and relative humidity (RH), as well as the amount of annual variation in precipitation (r: 0.548 to 0.721), and negatively correlated with the mean daily difference in the temperature (DIF T), duration of sunshine, and variance in RH (r: -0.694 to 0.495). In contrast, the anterior chamber (AC) volume was negatively correlated with the mean values of precipitation, temperature, RH, and the amount of annual variation in precipitation (r: -0.672 to -0.448), and positively associated with the mean DIF T (r = 0.570) and variance in temperature (r = 0.507). In total 19,988 eyes were analyzed at the eye level. After adjusting for age, precipitation was the major explanatory factor among the environmental factors for the variability in corneal thickness and AC volume. Conclusions: Individuals who were raised in warm and wet environments had thicker corneas and smaller AC volumes than those from cold and dry ambient environments. Our findings demonstrate the role of local environmental factors in corneal-related morphology.

Higher order aberrations and axial elongation in combined 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology for myopia control.

PURPOSE: To compare the changes in higher order aberrations (HOA's) for photopic and mesopic pupil diameters in children undergoing orthokeratology treatment (OK) or combined 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology treatment (AOK), and their association with axial elongation. METHODS: Children aged 6 to <11 years with 1.00-4.00 D of myopia were randomly assigned to each treatment group. Photopic and mesopic pupil diameters were quantified using automated pupillometry and HOA's were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer and Badal system to control for accommodation. HOA's were rescaled to photopic and mesopic pupil diameters and fitted with a 6th order Zernike polynomial expansion. Axial length was measured using an optical biometer under cycloplegia. RESULTS: Baseline and six-month data from 25 AOK and 28 OK participants were analysed. At the six-month visit, pupil diameter was larger in the AOK group under photopic conditions (3.70 ± 0.42 vs 3.12 ± 0.33 mm, p < 0.001), along with a range of HOA metrics [3rd to 6th order and higher order root mean square error values (HO RMS), all p ≤ 0.003] and individual Zernike terms (primary spherical aberration, and oblique quadrafoil, both p ≤ 0.03). Axial elongation was greater in the OK treatment group (0.05 ± 0.08 vs -0.01 ± 0.12 mm, p = 0.02). In the AOK group, axial elongation was correlated with the increase in photopic pupil diameter (r = -0.45, p = 0.02) and with several HOA metrics; however, these associations were not observed in the OK group. CONCLUSION: AOK treatment resulted in increased photopic pupil size and HOA's, and significantly less axial elongation over a six-month period compared to OK treatment alone. The improved myopia control observed with combination 0.01% atropine and orthokeratology may be a result of an enhanced optical effect due to a larger photopic pupil size.

Five-Year Changes in Corneal Astigmatism After Combined Femtosecond-Assisted Phacoemulsification and Arcuate Keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term stability of corneal astigmatism after combined femtosecond (fs)-assisted phacoemulsification and arcuate keratotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Surgery was performed using a Victus (Bausch & Lomb) platform. A single, 450-µm-deep arcuate keratotomy was paired at the 8-mm zone with the main phacoemulsification incision in the opposite meridian. The keratotomy incisions were not opened. Corneal astigmatism measurements obtained preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively were analyzed using vector analysis. RESULTS: A total of 44 eyes of 44 patients (mean age 66.0 ± 10.1 years) were included. The mean preoperative corneal astigmatism was 1.40 ± 0.66 diopters (D). This was reduced to 0.74 ± 0.54 D at 2 years and 0.70 ± 0.50 at 5 years postoperatively (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between postoperative corneal astigmatism at 2 years and at 5 years (P = .609). Both magnitude of error and absolute angle of error were comparable between the 2 postoperative time points (P > .805). At the end of 5 years, 65% of the eyes were within 15 degrees of the preoperative astigmatic meridian. Comparative analysis showed significantly higher surgically induced astigmatism, lower differences in vector and absolute angles of error for the eyes with preoperative with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism than eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism at 5 years (P < .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the stability of femtosecond (fs)-assisted arcuate keratotomy was well-maintained over 5 years. There was a tendency of increasing overcorrection of preoperative WTR astigmatism and undercorrection of ATR astigmatism over time.

The Effect of Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustment on Higher-Order Aberrations Before and After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients with and without intraoperative angle kappa adjustments. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series. One hundred six eyes of 106 patients who underwent SMILE at Tianjin Eye Hospital (Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism were divided into 2 groups. The first group consisted of eyes with intraoperative angle kappa adjustment and the second group consisted of eyes without adjustment. Preoperative and postoperative visual outcome, refraction, and HOA measurements at 1 and 3 months were compared. RESULTS: At the pupil size of 6 mm, vertical coma at 1 and 3 months after SMILE for the angle kappa-adjusted group was 0.153 ± 0.107 and 0.157 ± 0.094 µm, which were significantly lower than those of the nonadjusted group (0.204 ± 0.117 and 0.203 ± 0.113 µm, respectively) (P = 0.026 at 1 mo, P = 0.047 at 3 mo). The change in vertical coma between preoperative and postoperative measurements was 0.011 ± 0.136 and 0.023 ± 0.129 µm at 1 and 3 months postoperatively for the angle kappa-adjusted group, which were lower than those of the nonadjusted group (0.082 ± 0.165 and 0.085 ± 0.150 µm, respectively) (P = 0.023 at 1 mo, P = 0.045 at 3 mo). Subgroup analysis for eyes with large angle kappa demonstrated that the vertical coma was significantly less in the angle kappa-adjusted group at both 1 and 3 months (P = 0.009, P = 0.043, respectively). No significant correlation was observed between angle kappa and HOAs in the angle kappa-adjusted group. CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment of angle kappa during SMILE resulted in less HOAs. It would provide more insight on how to optimize treatment centration in SMILE.

Effect of corneal curvature on optical zone decentration and its impact on astigmatism and higher-order aberrations in SMILE and LASIK.

PURPOSE: To determine the association between anterior corneal curvature and optical zone centration as well as its impact on aberration profiles in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Seventy-eight eyes of 78 patients treated with SMILE (45 eyes) and LASIK (33 eyes) were included. The centration of the optical zone was evaluated on the instantaneous curvature difference map between the preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans using a superimposed set of concentric circles. The correlation between optical zone decentration and anterior keratometry values was evaluated. The effect of optical zone decentration on vector components of astigmatic correction and induction of higher-order aberrations (HOA) was assessed. RESULTS: The mean decentration distance was 0.21 ± 0.11 mm for SMILE and 0.20 ± 0.09 mm for LASIK (p = 0.808). There was a significant correlation between anterior keratometric astigmatism and decentration distance (r = 0.653, p < 0.001) for SMILE but not for LASIK (r = - 0.264, p = 0.138). Astigmatic correction was performed in 67 eyes. Optical zone decentration and the vector components of astigmatic correction were not correlated (p ≥ 0.420). Significant correlation was demonstrated between the decentration distance and the induced total coma (SMILE: r = 0.384, p = 0.009; LASIK: r = 0.553, p = 0.001) as well as the induced total HOA (SMILE: r = 0.498, p = 0.001; LASIK: r = 0.555, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anterior cornea astigmatism affected the treatment centration in SMILE but not LASIK. Subclinical decentration was associated with the induction of total coma and total HOA, but it did not affect the lower-order astigmatic correction.

Vector analysis of high (≥3 diopters) astigmatism correction using small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To compare the astigmatic correction in high myopic astigmatism between small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using vector analysis. SETTING: Hong Kong Laser Eye Center, Hong Kong. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Patients who had correction of myopic astigmatism of 3.0 diopters (D) or more and had either small-incision lenticule extraction or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were included. Only the left eye was included for analysis. Visual and refractive results were presented and compared between groups. RESULTS: The study comprised 105 patients (40 eyes in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and 65 eyes in the femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK group.) The mean preoperative manifest cylinder was -3.42 D ± 0.55 (SD) in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and -3.47 ± 0.49 D in the LASIK group (P = .655). At 3 months, there was no significant between-group difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .915) and manifest spherical equivalent (P = .145). Ninety percent and 95.4% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted cylindrical correction for the small-incision lenticule extraction and LASIK group, respectively (P = .423). Vector analysis showed comparable target-induced astigmatism (P = .709), surgically induced astigmatism vector (P = .449), difference vector (P = .335), and magnitude of error (P = .413) between groups. The absolute angle of error was 1.88 ± 2.25 degrees in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and 1.37 ± 1.58 degrees in the LASIK group (P = .217). CONCLUSION: Small-incision lenticule extraction offered astigmatic correction comparable to LASIK in eyes with high myopic astigmatism.

Comparing a new hydroexpression technique with conventional forceps method for SMILE lenticule removal.

BACKGROUND: We described a modified 'hydroexpression' technique for the lenticule removal during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and compared the results with conventional forceps method. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative study of 50 patients who underwent SMILE surgery by the same surgeon. We compared the 1-week and 3-months postoperative results after SMILE using the hydroexpression technique with the conventional forceps technique. Main outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, refractive accuracy, safety index and efficacy index. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. At postoperative 1 week, the safety index in forceps and hydroexpression group was 0.93±0.11 and 0.97±0.10, respectively (P=0.246). At 3 months, they were 1.00±0.06 and 0.99±0.09 (P=0.850). For efficacy indices, at 1 week they were 0.84±0.17 and 0.91±0.17 (P=0.158). At 3 months, they were 0.92±0.13 and 0.94±0.19 (P=0.624). All eyes aimed for a plano target. 96% in forceps group and 90% in hydroexpression group were within ±0.50 dioptre (D) in spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) correction at postoperative 3 months (P=0.567). The mean errors of SEQ correction were -0.10±0.21 D in forceps group and -0.08±0.30 D in hydroexpression group (P=0.705). CONCLUSION: Hydroexpression was simple and safe and had early results comparable to the conventional forceps technique. This technique was particularly useful for cases with more adhesions between lenticule and anterior cap, thin lenticule cases and for the inexperienced SMILE surgeons.

Determining total corneal power after small-incision lenticule extraction in myopic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the methods to correct corneal power after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and to estimate the preoperative corneal power based on postoperative values. SETTING: Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Equivalent keratometry (K) and mean K readings were obtained with the Pentacam HR. The clinical history method was used to calculate the theoretical postoperative K, which was then compared with equivalent K readings. In addition, the anterior-posterior (A-P) method was used to estimate the preoperative mean K. The agreement between computed and actual values was estimated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between the theoretical postoperative K (38.52 diopters [D] ± 1.57 [SD]) and mean K after surgery (39.44 ± 1.43 D) (R2 = 0.9317, P < .001). The mean equivalent K readings at 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 5.0 mm were not significantly different from the theoretical postoperative K values (P = .620, P = .514, and P = .622, respectively). Bland-Altman plots showed a high level of agreement when comparing the theoretical postoperative K with the clinical history K (-0.94 to +0.9 D, -0.83 to +0.88 D, and -0.84 to +0.88 D, respectively). In addition, the estimated preoperative mean K (43.28 ± 1.31 D) derived by the A-P method was comparable to the measured mean K (P = .111). CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent K readings provided a relatively good estimation of corneal power in eyes after small-incision lenticule extraction. The A-P method might be an option to predict preoperative corneal power.

Influence of Refractive Status on the Higher-Order Aberration Pattern After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of myopia on the pattern change in higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction. METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients were included: low myopia (≤-3.00 D), moderate myopia (-3.00 D to -6.00 D), and high myopia (≥-6.00 D). Total higher-order aberrations (tHOA), vertical coma ((Equation is included in full-text article.)), horizontal coma ((Equation is included in full-text article.)), and spherical aberration ((Equation is included in full-text article.)) were measured preoperatively and at postoperative 3 months. RESULTS: At the end of 3 months, tHOA changed significantly compared with the preoperative values (P < 0.05), except for (Equation is included in full-text article.)and (Equation is included in full-text article.)in the low myopia group. The change in (Equation is included in full-text article.), (Equation is included in full-text article.), and (Equation is included in full-text article.)in the moderate group (-0.299, -0.175, and 0.108 µm) was 2.020, 4.861, and 4.696 times higher than the low group (-0.148, -0.036, 0.023 µm) (P = 0.002, 0.001, 0.001), respectively. The value in the high group (-0.331, -0.192, 0.154 µm) was 1.107, 1.097 (P = 0.478, 0.665), and 1.426 times (P = 0.047) higher than the moderate group. The degree of myopia was positively correlated with Δ(Equation is included in full-text article.)(r = 0.447; P < 0.001) and Δ(Equation is included in full-text article.)(r = 0.496; P < 0.001), and negatively correlated with ΔtHOA (r = -0.363, P = 0.004) and Δ(Equation is included in full-text article.)(r = -0.599; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a different pattern of change in ocular aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction in patients with varying degrees of myopia. In patients with low myopia, there was no increase in (Equation is included in full-text article.)or (Equation is included in full-text article.). In high myopia, however, (Equation is included in full-text article.)increased with the degree of myopia, whereas the rising rate of coma was slowing.

Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the learning curve for small-incision lenticule extraction during the first 2 years of experience. METHODS: Small-incision lenticule extraction was performed using the 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) by the same surgeon. The initial 100 patients since the surgeon started operating independently were considered as group 1; the recent 100 patients were considered as group 2. The same laser settings and technique were used. The visual and refractive outcomes were compared between groups at postoperative 1 week and 6 months. Vector analysis was performed for eyes with astigmatic correction. RESULTS: Two hundred right eyes of 200 patients were included. Age, preoperative corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and central corneal thickness were similar between groups (P ≤ 0.154). Postoperatively, the efficacy index at 1 week was better in group 2 (group 1: 0.85 ± 0.16 vs. group 2: 0.91 ± 0.10, P = 0.019) but was similar between groups at 6 months (group 1: 0.91 ± 0.14 vs. group 2: 0.94 ± 0.08, P = 0.181). The safety index was higher in group 2 at 1 week (group 1: 0.93 ± 0.10 vs. group 2: 0.95 ± 0.08, P = 0.045) and 6 months postoperatively (group 1: 0.97 ± 0.07 vs. group 2: 0.99 ± 0.03, P = 0.011). Vector analysis showed that postoperative residual astigmatism and misalignment of astigmatic correction were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (P ≤ 0.039) at 1 week and 6 months. The duration of docking and that of lenticule extraction was shorter in group 2 (P ≤ 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that faster visual recovery, better safety profile, and more accurate astigmatic correction could be attained with increasing surgical experience.

Simple steep-axis marking technique using a corneal analyzer.

We describe a simple steep-axis marking technique that uses a corneal analyzer (OPD III scan) during arcuate keratotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The technique requires a single reference mark at the limbus, which does not have to be on the horizontal axis. Using the corneal analyzer, the angle between the steep axis and the reference line between the reference mark and the center of the cornea can be determined. The angle from the reference mark is used intraoperatively to locate the steep axis. This eliminates the potential error from different head positions during keratometry measurement and during traditional marking under the slitlamp. The marking technique can also be applied to toric intraocular lens implantation during cataract surgery.

Combined application of prophylactic corneal cross-linking and laser in-situ keratomileusis - a review of literature.

Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is safe and effective laser refractive procedures in treating refractive errors. However, regression of treatment and iatrogenic keratectasia remain to be a major concern, especially in treating thin cornea with high ametropia. Collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method in stopping keratoconus progression through increasing the biomechanical strength of the cornea. Adjuvant cross-linking to refractive procedures can theoretically help prevent regression and reduce the risk of keratectasia development by increasing the mechanical stability of cornea. During the procedure, riboflavin is directly applied to the corneal stroma, thereby reducing the need of de-epithelialization as in the conventional protocol for keratoconus. Currently, there is still no consensus regarding the indication of CXL during refractive procedure, nor any standardized treatment protocol. This article aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the use of adjuvant CXL in LASIK.

Comparison of corneal biomechanics after microincision lenticule extraction and small incision lenticule extraction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the change in corneal biomechanical properties after microincision lenticule extraction (MILE) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 eyes received MILE surgery with 2 mm opening incision, while 64 eyes received SMILE procedure with 5 mm opening incision. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) and 37 other biomechanical waveform parameters were quantitatively assessed using ocular response analyser (ORA) preoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively. All changes were calculated as the difference between preoperative and postoperative values (Δ). RESULTS: Both CH and CRF values decreased significantly after MILE and SMILE (p<0.001). ΔCRF (o=0.028) and ΔCRF index (ΔCRF/preoperative CRF) (p=0.043) were statistically lower for all eyes at 1-week follow-up. ΔCH index (ΔCH/preoperative CH) was statistically lower at 1-week (p=0.043) and 1-month (p=0.015) follow-ups in MILE group when compared with SMILE group. In both MILE and SMILE group, ΔCH index and ΔCRF index were positively correlated with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent, residual stromal thickness (RST) index (RST/preoperative central corneal thickness) and negatively correlated with lenticule thickness (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both MILE and SMILE procedures significantly altered the biomechanical characteristics of cornea. Smaller opening incision was associated with less reduction in ORA parameters during early postoperative period.

Effect of location of opening incision on astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction.

We compared the visual and refractive outcomes between 2 different incisional sites in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for low myopic astigmatism. This was a contralateral eye study. Consecutive cases that underwent bilateral SMILE surgery were included. Procedures for both eyes were identical apart from the location of opening incision. The incision was set on the temporal side for the right eye (Group 1), while a superior incision was set for the left eye (Group 2). Twenty-nine patients with a mean age of 35.0 ± 9.6 years were included. Preoperative visual and refractive parameters were comparable between the 2 groups (p > 0.250). At 3 months, the logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.074 ± 0.090 in Group 1 and 0.084 ± 0.130 in Group 2 (p = 0.861). No difference was found in the postoperative manifest spherical equivalent (p = 0.501) and manifest cylinder (p = 0.178) between the 2 groups. The efficacy index was 0.85 ± 0.16 in Group 1 and 0.85 ± 0.20 in Group 2 (p = 0.828). Astigmatic correction was not significantly affected by the location of opening incisions using vector analysis. Our study did not find significant differences in visual and refractive outcomes with temporal or superior opening incision during SMILE surgery.

Short-term Variance of Refractive Outcomes After Simultaneous LASIK and High-Fluence Cross-linking in High Myopic Correction.

PURPOSE: To analyze the visual and refractive outcomes of LASIK with and without simultaneous cross-linking for correction of myopia. METHODS: Patients who received femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with and without adjunctive cross-linking according to patient's preference were examined longitudinally for 6 months. Patients with myopic manifest refraction spherical equivalent of 5.00 diopters (D) or greater and estimated residual stromal thickness of greater than 250 µm were included. RESULTS: Overall, 120 eyes of 60 patients were included (60 eyes of 30 patients for LASIK with cross-linking; 60 eyes of 30 patients with LASIK only). No significant difference was observed in age, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, manifest sphere and cylinder, minimal corneal thickness, and residual stromal bed thickness between both groups (P ≥ .245). The uncorrected distance visual acuity and efficacy index were significantly worse on day 1 in eyes receiving adjunctive cross-linking (P = .0001). At 6 months, 86.7% and 95% of the eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in LASIK with cross-linking and LASIK only, respectively. The variance of postoperative spherical equivalent and sphere was significantly higher in eyes undergoing LASIK with cross-linking from 1 week up to 6 months compared to LASIK only (P ≤ .002). None of the patients required re-treatment up to 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive cross-linking during LASIK was associated with worse visual outcomes during the first postoperative week. The variance of spherical equivalent was also high in these patients over a 6-month follow-up. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):664-670.].